How to get Access to: 104 Technical trading experiments by HUNTER

Ethical Trader wrote:Thanks Kith. Confusion occurred as Hunter announced the restriction in his first post of this thread. Ideally, Admin should have done this, not Hunter. As you now say, Hunter has included SLS now, I feel Admin has ceded his powers to Hunter. ?What is the correct position?

කිත්සිරි ද සිල්වා wrote:I think some confusion is still shrouding the issue.
I believe, the access was restricted by the Admin of the forum and admission to the thread is given, based on requests only.
Those who have requested access (including me) have been granted access to without any preconditions.
Initially, all were having the same fate, including SLS and I believe, Hunter has later included him.
Hope this clears the confusion.

Ethical Trader wrote:Kith, I am not a regular contributor now. However, when I saw your strange comment I thought of commenting on this so-called restrictions of access. May I know who restricted access and also the list of restricted names? If SLS is one of the restricted persons. Its absurd.

කිත්සිරි ද සිල්වා wrote:This was what I posted earlier and is self-explanatory.

I think once it was made Restricted and if one is not added in there, he or she will not be able to see the contents of the original thread and not that anyone deliberately removed them is my understanding.
Once you are added there only you started seeing it again.
Same with Nihal too, I believe.

nihal123 wrote:

Veteran ට  පෝරම් එකේ අවැසි තැනකට යන්න හැකියාව තිබිය යුතුයි.

අපිට නැති උනාට කමක් නැහැ.

HUNTER wrote:

In that, 104...., thread, there were some comments, specially by SLS regarding the risks and sensitivity which might affect certain parties.

Therefore, Admin removed the whole thread from the forum's access, and moved to a restricted area; where nobody had access except the creator of the thread, @HUNTER.

HUNTER wrote:

@HUNTER had the authority to add any other member to the thread.

@ HUNTER requested 3 senor members; viz. Kith, Yellow Knife and Backstage to advice on whom should be grated access to the thread, only upon the requested of that member.

HUNTER wrote:
** On a personal note SLS, I am disappointed to see that you suspect some hidden agenda here. You look to have developed some imbalance of health or something?
If not I think your 'pride' may be in control of your comments.

slstock wrote:

But when I was left out of this restricted group , I was obviously not happy.
That another matter.

I see all my efforts  have been wasted and  backfired .

slstock wrote:
3) I raised the question on the Experiment as it was not clear what kind of
experiment it was and to give ideas to better formulate if it was scientific.

As you are math oriented/ scientific , I though this experiment  was such
as it was not clearly specified before. You have not done experiments
with people before using the  forum.  You did on your  tech/math experiments at home. Now you are using people.

slstock wrote:
You have misinterpreted and took every feedback   I  gave as an  offence.

slstock wrote:
3) No more comments from me or feedback.  
    Take me out of this group too . You"ll can do as you bid.
 

slstock wrote:
ps :

a) I could not find the original thread  where I commented when I first wrote.
 If I missed the original thread and if that  was not moved to the restricted
area/ group  then I apologize for my lapse on that count.  

(When I saw a restricted area which I don't have access to and missed
seeing the original thread , I thought it too was moved to the restricted area)

slstock wrote:
b) Btw, for factual purposes , yes a Bull market can last 2 years.
    It lasted from 2009-2011 as you know.
 
It can happen again

slstock wrote:This is getting too complicated.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Here is what I understand.

a) First , I was not in this restricted group. - no one was in this group unless requested. No one except HUNTER added to this new public group when it was created

b) Now Hunter has added me to the restricted group after my query. If you requested, you may be added, so you were added. That is how it must work

c)  But  when  I wished to be removed from it,   Hunter cannot remove me . He said "I cannot take you out of this group." must be correct and technical reason in the system. I have to check


Okay ...here is the summary

a) I managed to unsubscribe myself from the group. public group anyone can freely join or leave. only thing here when joining it must be accepted
Problem solved.


b) I took time to give  feedback as such was requested by Hunter in the original thread. I gave in good faith to protect you"ll/forum including tranparency issues. accepted. that is why that thread was made restricted. must thank you

I done my part.



c)  Kithsiri  is  part of the group.  He is also a Moderator
    Admin can see all this too. 

    They both can oversee all this. i have not read content. all I asked were requests to be accepted with care based on few guidelines.


Am out of all this.
Good luck with the  experiment.

කිත්සිරි ද සිල්වා wrote:He is already there.

Backstage wrote:I think everyone's intentions were are pure. And I mean everyone including the comments. No jokers or trouble makers. The problem is the way the changes  were enabled and most importantly communicated on the open thread. I believe that the modalities were not properly thought through as well.
Lets hit the reset button guys, before Jokers and loafers join in to inflame.

HUNTER wrote:Dear Admin,

I would like to make the following as moderators of the 'Restricted Tech Group', so that, any of them can add or remove suitable members upon request.

1. SLS (upon his consent only)
2. Kith
3. YK
4. BS

-----
....and I can be focused on the 'experiment' than experimenting with executive powers.
 

කිත්සිරි ද සිල්වා wrote:Yes go ahead.
You have mine.

yellow knife wrote:I will be there but I dont have time for moderating and leave me alone on that.

Topcat , since this is an experiment let few selected old members run it first.