The Investor Sentiment - Equity and investments forum for Sri Lankans
The Investor Sentiment - Equity and investments forum for Sri Lankans
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Please send an email to if you face any technical difficulties when posting
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
HAYC - HaycarbToday at 6:24 pmWonderer
Plantation Sector UpdatesTue Oct 20, 2020 3:11 pmslstock
LWL.N0000 (Lanka Walltiles PLC)Fri Oct 16, 2020 12:50 amsubash
CSE Daylight Robbery !Mon Sep 21, 2020 9:54 pmYin-Yang
Trading Journal Tue Sep 15, 2020 10:37 pmThe Invisible
AEL Access EngineeringTue Sep 15, 2020 7:24 pmsmallville
CFVF - First CapitalWed Sep 09, 2020 9:42 pmWonderer
අනං මනං! #/+?.<>Tue Aug 18, 2020 11:15 pmYin-Yang
Ceylon Tobacco CTCSun Aug 16, 2020 5:11 pmThe Invisible
Sunshine HoldingsFri Aug 14, 2020 9:39 pmThe Invisible

Information posted in this forum are entirely of the respective members' personal views. The views posted on this open online forum of contributors do not constitute a recommendation buy or sell. The site nor the connected parties will be responsible for the posts posted on the forum and will take best possible action to remove any unlawful or inappropriate posts.
All rights to articles of value authored by members posted on the forum belong to the respective authors. Re-using without the consent of the authors is prohibited. Due credit with links to original source should be given when quoting content from the forum.
This is an educational portal and not one that gives recommendations. Please obtain investment advises from a Registered Investment Advisor through a stock broker

Go down
Top contributor
Top contributor
Posts : 3775
Join date : 2014-02-24

Rajaratnam loses bid to cut insider trading sentence Empty Rajaratnam loses bid to cut insider trading sentence

on Mon Mar 06, 2017 12:38 pm
Rajaratnam loses bid to cut insider trading sentence

March 6, 2017

A US federal judge has rejected Galleon Group hedge fund founder Raj Rajaratnam’s bid to void much of his insider trading conviction and shorten his 11-year prison sentence, Reuters reported.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan said Rajaratnam failed to show his actual innocence on five of the 14 counts on which he was convicted, or that two other counts should be vacated because the main government witness committed perjury.

Preska also rejected Rajaratnam’s argument that his trial counsel was ineffective, and denied Rajaratnam’s bid to reduce the $53.8 million he agreed to forfeit to about $4.3 million.

Christine Chung, a lawyer for Rajaratnam, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan declined to comment through a spokeswoman.

Rajaratnam is the highest-profile fund manager convicted in Bharara’s crackdown on insider trading, which since 2009 has led to more than 80 convictions and guilty pleas, including a guilty plea from billionaire Steven A. Cohen’s SAC Capital Advisors LP.

Prosecutors said Rajaratnam made up to $63.8 million from 2003 to 2009 through insider trading in stocks such as eBay Inc (EBAY.O), Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N) and Google Inc, now called Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O).

Rajaratnam, 59, was convicted in May 2011 on nine securities fraud counts and five conspiracy counts. He has served 5-1/4 years in prison and is eligible for release in July 2021.

Former McKinsey & Co chief and Goldman director Rajat Gupta is awaiting a federal appeals court decision on whether to reverse his conviction for providing tips about Goldman.

In seeking a shorter sentence, Rajaratnam said he did not provide benefits to insiders for confidential information related to trades underlying five counts, or know that insiders provided that information for the sake of any benefit.

But on Dec. 6, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a separate case that gifts of confidential information could violate securities laws even if recipients did not give tangible benefits in return.

Preska wrote: “Here, because all the information was transferred between trading relatives or friends, the mere transfer of information is sufficient to constitute a benefit.”

Rajaratnam, moreover, “had knowledge that inside information was being conferred in exchange for such benefit,” she added.

The judge also rejected Rajaratnam’s claim that former McKinsey partner Anil Kumar perjured himself, citing alleged contradictory testimony Kumar gave three years later at a trial of Rajaratnam’s younger brother Rengan, who was acquitted.

Preska said the alleged contradictions were immaterial, and that “a faulty memory resulting in inaccuracies or mistakes” did not mean perjury occurred.
Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum