The Investor Sentiment - Equity and investments forum for Sri Lankans
The Investor Sentiment - Equity and investments forum for Sri Lankans
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Please send an email to contact.lankaninvestor@gmail.com if you face any technical difficulties when posting
Search
Display results as :
Advanced Search
Latest topics
Dividend AnnouncementsTue Aug 04, 2020 5:21 pmRana
Gota's EraTue Aug 04, 2020 8:49 amyellow knife
SEYB.N0000 (Seylan Bank PLC)Fri Jul 31, 2020 8:37 amNIRMALSG
JKH.N0000Thu Jul 30, 2020 10:48 amThe Invisible
AIA InsuranceTue Jul 28, 2020 8:54 amThe Invisible
CCS.N0000 ( Ceylon Cold Stores)Sat Jul 25, 2020 9:29 pmSri
What to AnalyseFri Jul 24, 2020 9:27 amchutiputha
Happy BirthdayFri Jul 24, 2020 9:18 amchutiputha
AEL Technical AnalysisWed Jul 22, 2020 10:17 amBackstage
HAYC - HaycarbWed Jul 22, 2020 5:57 amserene
Trading Journal Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:09 amsmallville
SLTL.NThu Jul 16, 2020 9:48 amThe Invisible
Films - To Watch ListFri Jul 10, 2020 8:33 amyellow knife
Rajgama Heroes !Sun Jul 05, 2020 10:05 pmserene
LIOC.N0000 (Lanka IOC PLC)Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:00 amLSE
CFVF - First CapitalSat Jun 27, 2020 10:22 pmHUNTER
RCL - Royal CeramicsSat Jun 27, 2020 4:02 amdesh87
LOLC HoldingsMon Jun 22, 2020 3:40 pmRajapaksap
SAMP.N0000 (Sampath Bank PLC)Fri Jun 19, 2020 1:08 pmdakzsl
Disclaimer


Information posted in this forum are entirely of the respective members' personal views. The views posted on this open online forum of contributors do not constitute a recommendation buy or sell. The site nor the connected parties will be responsible for the posts posted on the forum and will take best possible action to remove any unlawful or inappropriate posts.
All rights to articles of value authored by members posted on the forum belong to the respective authors. Re-using without the consent of the authors is prohibited. Due credit with links to original source should be given when quoting content from the forum.
This is an educational portal and not one that gives recommendations. Please obtain investment advises from a Registered Investment Advisor through a stock broker

Go down
puliyanam
puliyanam
Top contributor
Top contributor
Posts : 463
Join date : 2014-02-28

Is Photography an Art? Empty Is Photography an Art?

on Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:39 pm
Message reputation : 100% (2 votes)
Guys

If you think photography is an art this article may offend you. So I warned. I know a photographer who calls himself photo-artist. But this debate is 100 years im told but new for me...


Photography is not an art. It is a technology. We have no excuse to ignore this obvious fact in the age of digital cameras, when the most beguiling high-definition images and effects are available to millions. My iPad can take panoramic views that are gorgeous to look at. Does that make me an artist? No, it just makes my tablet one hell of a device.

The news that landscape photographer Peter Lik has sold his picture Phantom for $6.5m (£4.1m), setting a new record for the most expensive photograph of all time, will be widely taken as proof to the contrary. In our world where money talks, the absurd inflated price that has been paid by some fool for this “fine art photograph” will be hailed as proof that photography has arrived as art.

Yet a closer look at Phantom reveals exactly the opposite. This record-setting picture typifies everything that goes wrong when photographers think they are artists. It is derivative, sentimental in its studied romanticism, and consequently in very poor taste. It looks like a posh poster you might find framed in a pretentious hotel room.

Phantom is a black-and-white shot taken in Antelope Canyon, Arizona. The fact that it is in black and white should give us pause. Today, this deliberate use of an outmoded style can only be nostalgic and affected, an “arty” special effect. We’ve all got that option in our photography software. Yeah, my pics of the Parthenon this summer looked really awesome in monochrome.

Lik’s photograph is of course beautiful in a slick way, but beauty is cheap if you point a camera at a grand phenomenon of nature. The monochrome detailing of the canyon is sculptural enough, and a shaft of sunlight penetrating its depths becomes the phantom of the title. Yet, in fact, this downward stream of light is simply a natural aspect of Antelope Canyon. Look it up online and you will find a vast range of photographs that all show the same feature. They are all just as striking as Phantom. The photographer has added nothing of any value to what was there already. Google is full of “great” pictures of this awe-inspiring natural feature.

Someone has been very foolish with their money, mistaking the picturesque for high art.

As a colour picture without any arty claims, this would be a valuable record of nature. Instead, it claims to be more than that; it aspires to be “art”. It is this ostentatious artfulness that pushes it into the realm of the false. For the artistic ambition of this picture is so very derivative from paintings that were created more than a century ago. Just like the very first “art” photographers in the Victorian age, Lik apes the classics in order to seem classic.

Phantom aims for the sublime, that sense of awe in front of nature that was described by Edmund Burke in the 18th century and taken to lavish heights by painters in the 19th. American painters especially, such as Frederic Edwin Church and Albert Bierstadt, used a heightened romantic style to express the grandeur and amazement of the American landscape. Later, Georgia O’Keeffe added a surreal dreaminess to the west’s iconography. Film-makers, above all John Ford, were influenced by the American landscape painters when they put the west on screen.

Phantom comes along in the wake of all these representations of the American landscape in art – and lazily emulates them. It is a cliche: easy on the eye, easy on the brain, hackneyed and third-hand.

If this is the most valuable “fine art photograph” in history, God help fine art photography. For this hollow and overblown creation exposes the illusion that lures us all, when we’re having a good day with a good camera – the fantasy that taking a picture is the same thing as making a work of art

http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2014/dec/10/most-expensive-photograph-ever-hackneyed-tasteless#gsc.tab=0
avatar
roshana7549
Posts : 277
Join date : 2014-04-18

Is Photography an Art? Empty Re: Is Photography an Art?

on Tue Dec 22, 2015 7:57 pm
Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)
Thanks, Good article.... Learned something....
First Guy
First Guy
Posts : 2533
Join date : 2014-02-22

Is Photography an Art? Empty Re: Is Photography an Art?

on Wed Dec 23, 2015 7:07 am
Message reputation : 100% (1 vote)
The same will go to music with many things that can be done through technology. I hear there are 'sound engineers'.

True that some devices can take great looking photographs in general. But for different situations, a photographer with knowledge and experience (and with a good camera and lens) can do a much better job.

Try taking a shot with a DSLR on auto then compare with various shots taken by adjusting the settings.
Back to top
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum